Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area categoryAnonymous Online Misconduct

Internet Law Firm Obtains Two Court Orders to Identify Anonymous Defamers

  |   Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Kronenberger Rosenfeld has obtained two important court orders to assist the victim of anonymous online defamation in identifying the anonymous defendants.

Kronenberger Rosenfeld, representing the plaintiff, filed a John Doe lawsuit against anonymous defendants. The plaintiff alleged that the anonymous defendants had posted defamatory statements about him on a Facebook account and distributed those defamatory statements to his friends and family. After filing the lawsuit, Plaintiff obtained a court order allowing expedited discovery and served a subpoena on Facebook. In response to the subpoena, Facebook identified four IP addresses that had been used to post the defamatory comments. Three of the IP addresses are owned by Sprint and the fourth is owned by Time Warner Cable.

The plaintiff served subpoenas on Sprint and Time Warner to obtain the account information associated with these IP addresses. In response to the subpoena to Time Warner, a pseudonymous party, “Jane Doe,” moved to quash the subpoena. In response to the subpoena to Sprint, Sprint responded that it could not produce the requested information without a court order or consent from the consumer under California Code of Civil Procedure section 1985.3 and Public Utilities Code section 2891. Kronenberger Rosenfeld, on behalf of the plaintiff, moved the Court to enforce both of the subpoenas.

On December 13, 2011, the San Francisco Superior Court issued two orders allowing the plaintiff to enforce both of the subpoenas. First, the Court issued an order denying Jane Doe’s motion to quash the subpoena to Time Warner. The Court found that the plaintiff was entitled to the discovery at issue, and that Jane Does’ objections were without merit. Second, the Court issued an order requiring Sprint to respond to the subpoena.

These are two important orders regarding discovery into the sources of anonymous online defamation.

Turner v. Does, Case No. CGC-11-512960 (San Francisco Superior Court).






Related articles

Anonymous Online Misconduct
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Be Careful What You Click On

That URL Typo Can Break Your Bank Account By Karl Kronenberger Partner, Kronenberger Rosenfeld It’s an easy mistake to make, and it can be costly...

Read More

Anonymous Online Misconduct
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Gregory Alexander Pleads Guilty to Criminal Hacking Charge

Today criminal defendant Gregory Alexander pled guilty to unlawfully accessing the email account of victim Randall Hough, under 18 U.S.C. Section 2701(a)(1) (Unauthorized Access to...

Read More

Anonymous Online Misconduct
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Karl Kronenberger Discusses Data Ransoming in Lawyer Monthly

Ransomware, which is a form of malware that encrypts data and demands a payment from the victim to unlock it, is a growing problem. And...

Read More

Anonymous Online Misconduct
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Jeff Rosenfeld Gives Warning to Individuals Looking to

In the article, “Christmas is the season for giving…money to scammers?” published by InsideCounsel, Partner Jeff Rosenfeld discusses common charity scams that occur during the...

Read More

Open Newsletter Signup Popup