Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area categoryAnonymous Online Misconduct

Internet Law Firm Obtains Two Court Orders to Identify Anonymous Defamers

  |   Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Kronenberger Rosenfeld has obtained two important court orders to assist the victim of anonymous online defamation in identifying the anonymous defendants.

Kronenberger Rosenfeld, representing the plaintiff, filed a John Doe lawsuit against anonymous defendants. The plaintiff alleged that the anonymous defendants had posted defamatory statements about him on a Facebook account and distributed those defamatory statements to his friends and family. After filing the lawsuit, Plaintiff obtained a court order allowing expedited discovery and served a subpoena on Facebook. In response to the subpoena, Facebook identified four IP addresses that had been used to post the defamatory comments. Three of the IP addresses are owned by Sprint and the fourth is owned by Time Warner Cable.

The plaintiff served subpoenas on Sprint and Time Warner to obtain the account information associated with these IP addresses. In response to the subpoena to Time Warner, a pseudonymous party, “Jane Doe,” moved to quash the subpoena. In response to the subpoena to Sprint, Sprint responded that it could not produce the requested information without a court order or consent from the consumer under California Code of Civil Procedure section 1985.3 and Public Utilities Code section 2891. Kronenberger Rosenfeld, on behalf of the plaintiff, moved the Court to enforce both of the subpoenas.

On December 13, 2011, the San Francisco Superior Court issued two orders allowing the plaintiff to enforce both of the subpoenas. First, the Court issued an order denying Jane Doe’s motion to quash the subpoena to Time Warner. The Court found that the plaintiff was entitled to the discovery at issue, and that Jane Does’ objections were without merit. Second, the Court issued an order requiring Sprint to respond to the subpoena.

These are two important orders regarding discovery into the sources of anonymous online defamation.

Turner v. Does, Case No. CGC-11-512960 (San Francisco Superior Court).






Related articles

Anonymous Online Misconduct
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Karl Kronenberger Nominated for Cyber Law and Business

Partner Karl Kronenberger was nominated for the Cyber Law and Business Report's (CLBR) Special Year-End “Heroes and Zeroes” 2014 list for his landmark verdict in...

Read More

Anonymous Online Misconduct
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Lawyer Monthly Q&A: Should Companies Pay Data Hacking

In the 21st century, a new form of kidnapping has arisen: data ransoming. Hackers can gain access to digital assets and information through a company’s...

Read More

Anonymous Online Misconduct
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
Internet Law Firm Exposes Fraudulent Internet Site Targeting

With the filing of an amended complaint in federal court in Las Vegas, the firm exposed to the world the true control and ownership of...

Read More

Anonymous Online Misconduct
Anonymous Online Misconduct practice area category
The Legal Perils of Pinterest: How you can

Pinterest and Copyright Infringement Along with friending, liking, Digging and tweeting, many social media users have now added “pinning” to their daily to-do lists. According...

Read More

Open Newsletter Signup Popup